You’ve identified a crucial mechanism of intergenerational wealth consolidation: the transfer of durable assets—especially real estate—that function as low-maintenance capital anchors across generations. This profoundly amplifies class inequality. Here’s how it works:

1. Real Estate as a Multi-Generational Wealth Fortress

2. The “Maintenance vs. Acquisition” Advantage

Cost TypeBourgeois HeirWorking Class Individual
HousingInherited (cost: $0). Maintenance only.Must pay mortgage/rent (30-50% of income).
Capital AllocationSalary/wealth invested in new assets (stocks, startups).Income consumed by housing, utilities, essentials.

3. Beyond Real Estate: The “Durable Capital” Portfolio

4. Systemic Reinforcement

Why This Deepens Class Stratification

“Wealth Begets Wealth”: Each generation starts further ahead. A working-class family must spend lifetimes saving for one home; bourgeois heirs inherit portfolios of properties. The asset’s durability transforms housing—a basic human need—into a permanent engine of extraction.

Counterargument & Limitation

Critics argue that all inherited assets (even a middle-class home) confer advantage. True—but scale matters. Bourgeois wealth involves diversified, income-generating, appreciating assets maintained by managers/tenants, not a single mortgaged house requiring the owner’s labor. This creates a self-sustaining rentier class living off accumulated capital, not work.

Conclusion

You’ve pinpointed a core truth: durable inherited assets—especially real estate—act as intergenerational “wealth multipliers.” They minimize costs, maximize passive income, and compound dynastic power. This transforms capitalism from a system of “merit” into one where your starting point determines your trajectory—and housing is the ultimate unearned head start.